Monolithic vs. two-piece
OpenChip can build your chip two ways.
Monolithic — one sealed block, channels as internal voids.
Two-piece — split at a cut plane into a channel plate and a lid, bonded after printing. This is the default.
The short version
Section titled “The short version”| Monolithic | Two-piece | |
|---|---|---|
| Drainage | Hard, sometimes impossible | Trivial — open grooves |
| Leaks | Nothing to leak | A bond that can |
| Assembly | None | Align and glue |
| Optical access | Through the block | Can use a glass lid |
| Minimum channel | ~0.5 mm realistically | Down to the printer’s limit |
| Print time | One part | Two, but both thinner |
If you are not sure, use two-piece. It is the default for good reason.
Why two-piece is usually right
Section titled “Why two-piece is usually right”The channels are open until the lid goes on. Uncured resin rinses straight out, which removes the single biggest failure mode in resin microfluidics — see Draining uncured resin.
It also lets you go smaller. Below about 0.5 mm, draining a sealed channel stops being reliably possible; as an open groove, the limit is just the printer’s resolution.
And it gives you options a sealed block does not: a glass lid for optical work, a membrane between two layers, or a lid you remove to clean and re-bond.
The cost is a bond, and a bond is a seam that can leak. Getting a good one is its own skill — see Bonding and sealing a two-piece chip.
When monolithic is right
Section titled “When monolithic is right”Large channels, short paths. A chip with 1 mm channels and a direct route between two ports drains fine. If you can flush it clear in a minute, the argument against monolithic mostly evaporates.
High pressure. No seam means no seam to fail. If you are running near what the material will take, monolithic is stronger.
Complex 3D routing. Channels crossing over each other at different heights cannot be expressed as a single split plane. (OpenChip’s channel graph is planar at a single Z, so this is more a note about where you would need another tool.)
Nothing to align. No jig, no clamp, no cure time. For a quick one-off, it can be genuinely faster.
The split height
Section titled “The split height”Where the cut plane sits, from the bottom of the block. 2 mm by default, the mid-plane of the default 4 mm chip.
Rectangular channels are placed so their ceiling sits at the cut plane, which gives you a flat lid with no features on it — the easiest thing to bond and the easiest thing to replace with glass.
Raise the split height for a thicker channel plate and a thinner lid; lower it for the reverse.
Checking it in the preview
Section titled “Checking it in the preview”Explode in the CAD toolbar separates the two halves so you can see the bonding faces. Disabled on a monolithic chip, which has nothing to separate.
Worth doing before every print. It is where you notice that a channel is open at the split plane where you did not mean it to be, or that the lid has a feature on it you did not expect.
What the checks do differently
Section titled “What the checks do differently”The drainage checks —
enclosed-cavity and
undrained-region — only run on
an enclosed chip. A two-piece split is open by construction, so they stay
quiet.
That is not the checks being lenient. It is that the problem does not exist.
Switching later
Section titled “Switching later”Change Split type in the CAD panel at any time. The channel network is unaffected — it is the same graph either way — and the solid rebuilds.
Nothing is lost by trying both and looking at them.